About
Mission
We connect journalism, community building and posting to feed society with reliable data and create equal development opportunities.
Vision
We are building a future where transparency, social cohesion and flexible talent combine to create impactful, data-driven decision-making.
About
De onderzoekers van Ko'W' Checking zijn professionals van het AgapeUnit-team die zich richten op onafhankelijke, data gedreven berichtgeving. Via onze eigen platform bieden wij de samenleving betrouwbare en feitelijk onderbouwde informatie, gebaseerd op zorgvuldig onderzoek en verificatie. Ko'W' Checking werkt met een eigen redactie en onderzoeksstructuur. Informatie wordt uitsluitend gepubliceerd na interne controle. Indien nodig corrigeren of brengen wij dieptegang in berichten afkomstig van andere nieuwsbronnen wanneer deze onjuist of onvolledig blijken te zijn. Wij bieden organisaties de mogelijkheid om advertenties en promotionele boodschappen te plaatsen op onze website en via onze sociale mediakanalen. Deze commerciële dienstverlening heeft geen invloed op onze redactionele onafhankelijkheid. Ongeacht de achtergrond of doelstellingen van een organisatie, blijven wij feitelijk en onafhankelijk rapporteren. Wij formuleren onze artikelen naar waarheid en zonder redactionele binding aan commerciële of politieke belangen. Transparantie en integriteit vormen hierbij de basis.

Less frequent reporting or lower visibility, Wall Street discussion blows over to Europe

As the chorus of corporate executives complains again about quarterly stress, Washington is opening up the discussion with a proposal to have publicly traded companies no longer report quarterly but twice a year, a move that the White House says will cut costs and give executives more time to build rather than bookkeep.

The key lies not in a presidential announcement but with the securities watchdog that has mandated quarterly reporting since the 1970s. And which can adjust the frequency only through formal regulation, with a draft, public consultation and review before any form changes, making the process a legal march rather than a sprint. Proponents see alignment with practices in the United Kingdom and parts of the European Union where semi-annual reports are the norm and quarterly updates are mostly voluntary, reducing administrative friction and shifting the focus from short hits to long lines, although at the same time regulators there have remained strict on quality and comparability.

Opponents point to the gap created when regular information disappears, because fewer metrics means later visibility of setbacks and more room for noise, while studies show that liquidity actually declines when companies reduce reporting frequency and investors more frequently turn to alternative and less reliable sources. Meanwhile, the market itself is divided, big-name issuers praising fewer commitments as oxygen for strategy, while professional investors stress the importance of quick and consistent data points that keep risks visible. And analysts expect that, even with a rule change, many companies will voluntarily stay on quarterly routes to tie up capital at a reasonable price.

Those who look at it soberly see a tension between reporting as a cost and reporting as a public deal, where the outcome is not just about paperwork but about how trust is organized in a market that runs on timely information and equal access. And in which any shift in pace only works when the quality of content remains at least the same and oversight is visibly on top of it.

Total
0
Shares
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Surinaamse vlag Agape Unit Surinaamse vlag Agape Unit Surinaamse vlag Agape Unit Surinaamse vlag Agape Unit Surinaamse vlag Agape Unit Surinaamse vlag Surinaamse vlag Agape Unit Surinaamse vlag Agape Unit Surinaamse vlag Agape Unit Surinaamse vlag Agape Unit Surinaamse vlag Agape Unit Surinaamse vlag